This option ensures that only the first one to appear is downloaded. This is generally sufficient for the feed to populate and start downloading all the torrents. You can always manually download a show by double-clicking it. This, for the most part, is sufficient if you just want to watch all the episodes as they are released. But, what if you added a feed that had a back catalogue of 10 seasons? The RSS Downloader window has a number of settings allowing you to select the specific episodes of a show you want to download.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. Abhiroop Basu is an opinionated tech and digital media blogger. As a doe-eyed twenty-something, he started his first blog TechComet to comment on anything tech-related that caught his omniscient eye. And in my opinion not so practical method is described. At this point, you can either browse the available plugin list on sourceforge.
The SourceForge list automatically filters out anything you already installed in Azureus, so you don't end up with duplicate files. The plugin is downloaded from sourceforge. When installation is complete, Azureus provides a popup notification. Click the Close button on the installation dialog box.
Highlight RSSFeed. If you don't do this, you need to manually activate the plugin each time you open Azureus, which defeats the purpose of automated downloads.
Locate a feed you want to add. Name the feed, paste the URL in the URL box, choose a folder where you want to download the torrents and check the box to make the feed Active. Use ". Examples: Match all episodes of the 3rd season: "TvShowName. Example: M? Important: Matched names are saved in the history file. This history file is used to avoid downloading torrent for the same content more than once.
That's why you should use season and episode numbers in filters for tv shows like in the examples from above. Here is an example for filter creation. Let's say there are two torrents in the feed: TvShow. XviD-xx1 TvShow. And that means that "TvShow" will never be downloaded again.
That's great. But maybe someone doesn't. Maybe they want only a torrent with the name Scrubs in it and nothing else. Something their friend uploads maybe. I guess you don't use search engines much, the usually drop punctuation. I assume that's what happens here. So a search for Being. Erica is viewed as BeingErica. Erica, but "Being? Erica" guarantees that should any matching methods change, it will still work. Again, this is user error, not a "broken" system. Something being non-intuitive to you doesn't mean it's non-intuitive to everyone else.
You just failed to RTFM. Take someone who's never seen a car and throw them into it. It's not intuitive. Or put them in a plane and ask them to fly. Or do math. Very few things are intuitive. They're intuitive because of our experience, they're "familiar".
That's one of the basics of Software Engineer: make it look like something else so it's familiar. If you're a younger generation that's only ever used Google, you're used to searches being completely rewritten by Google to find what you meant instead of what you typed. Things are ONLY intuitive if you understand how they work.
In this case, matching requires exact phrases. So you need wildcards. It's very intuitive once you accept that and RTFM. Space is not a wildcard, but a wildcard will match to space.
You won't need 3 separate filters. The downside is, you will also catch things like "Being Erica Really Sucks". But alas, it's attempted to filter everything unwanted instead of randomly matching to everything with the words "being" and "erica" in them. The way YOU think it should work, makes it difficult in many situations to get what you want. Go to TV.
Your logic would have uTorrent matching to at least of those. So now instead of adding 1 wildcard and a few "not" filters, people wanting "House" need 99 not filters. That seems pretty selfish of you, don't you think? The guide shouldn't have to say "You need to use wildcards to match everything" because that's what the term wildcard means. It's not going to define each word. There's also Google that turns up really great tutorials if it doesn't make sense.
Had you attempted to find an answer before coming here to call things broken, you would've seen that. In addition, there's a bunch of posts in the forums that talk about RSS and wildcards. You're failing to attempt to help yourself, and decide instead to call things "broken" without considering the ramifications of how you think it should work.
Erica", "Being. Xvid", Being. It knows about episode numbers and it knows about most compression methods. If you want it to match any release group with any possible naming convention which not everyone will and that's why it doesn't work the way you want it to , you add wildcards.
So you can stop saying "you have to add all he crap that comes after codec, no matter what kind of parantheses are used", because you DON'T! And you can stop you shouldn't have to, because as I've shown with my "house" example, that's a really terrible way to do it as it makes life VERY difficult for everyone else.
The way it is works best for everyone, not just you. So yes, I will continue to say RTFM and blame the user because I don't want to see myself needing to add hundreds of "not" filters to stop getting things I don't want.
Some of those would easily match to 15 or so results if your method is implemented. That's more words I need to add into "NOT" so you can get away with easily getting 1 show and not have to use wildcards? I don't think so. RTFM and figure it out. This is the way practically every search engine, every word editor and almost every other filter does it. For a search it always best to use the greedy option, especially if you don't know or can rely on what the data is looking like.
So, i like Scrubs, but what about specials that don't fit in the naming convention? I will miss them. And, sure, every search is unintuitive if you have never seen a computer. But assuming that a user can use Google, a file search or a word search, this filter is still not intuitive.
It would be if it would behave like these other common filters. You can set a filter to be greedy or not to be greedy. There are disadvantages for both options, so both should be included. Every search engine would ignore the second space.
0コメント